Nelson & Associates Realtors^®... Call Today 608-438-5230 • Jon@jonnelson.com
Your Complete Guide to South Central Wisconsin Real Estate for Sale.

🏡 Case Study

 

When “Clean” Wasn’t Clean — How a Veteran Broker Protected His Seller from a Hidden Lease Contingency: A Possible Oversight or Maybe a Strategic Stall

🔍 The Setup: A Clean Offer... Almost

The listing was marketed at $395,000 and offered a $5,000 seller credit toward buyer closing costs. An offer arrived from first-time buyers requesting a $15,000 price reduction to $380,000. Their offer also included a brokerage addendum seeking a $495 "transaction fee" in addition to the Buyer Agent Commission stipulated by the seller in the listing agreement.

Notably, the Offer To Purchase, which controls the transaction (not the MLS listing) contained no mention of the $5,000 credit, effectively removing it and positioning the offer within $10,000 of the seller's expected price.

🎯 Broker’s Adjustment

Rather than haggle line by line, Broker Jon re-calibrated for simplicity and clarity:

• Updated the MLS price to $385,000, baking in the removed $5,000 credit
• Countered at $385,000 (effectively splitting the difference) with no transaction fee (Counter-Offer No. 1)

Although the credit had been dropped from the buyer’s offer, Jon factored it in without objection. It would preserve goodwill if challenged and would avoid unnecessary friction.

The buyers responded with Counter-Offer No. 2, accepting price and compensation but inserting an unanticipated bump clause tied to a lease they hadn’t disclosed. The clause gave them 72 hours to respond if bumped, and allowed them to claim resolution by simply stating they’d found someone to sublet their apartment—with no documentation required.

Problem: A second buyer, in this fast-paced market, might not be willing to wait for three days with no guarantee the bump would clear. Worse yet, the bump might not clear at all. Moreover, the seller might have been as generous with their counter-offer had the Bump Contingency been disclosed up front. At Issue: Potentially losing both buyers.

 

🧠 Professional Courtesy First

Before responding formally, Jon extended a professional olive branch. He reached out to the buyer’s agent and asked whether she’d like to clarify the vague bump language to better define the buyer’s choices and obligations.

Her reply: “I’ll let you know if I decide to make any changes.”

With time ticking and ambiguity lingering, Jon didn’t wait. He chose clarity over confusion and took action to protect his client.

🛠️ Tactical Response: Counter-Offer No. 3

In concert with his clients, Jon delivered a firm but fair response that:

• Preserved goodwill with the agreed-upon $385,000 price
• Reduced the bump clause window from 72 to 48 hours to create urgency
• Required a written waiver of all contingencies covered by the bump, including lease-related risks
• Demanded seller-satisfactory documentation proving either:
  • A formal lease release
  • Or written landlord or property manager approval of a sublease transferring full lease responsibility
• Paused all deadlines (except earnest money) until the bump clause was properly waived
• Struck the $495 fee from the addendum to ensure fee terms matched the agreement

Jon didn’t overreact. He re-balanced the deal, clarified the playing field, removed unnecessary costs, and shifted control back to the seller without penalizing the buyers for what may have been ineffective first-time buyer guidance.

🚦 Outcome

The counter-offer was delivered on time, clean, and enforceable. The buyer’s agent didn’t revise her language or engage further: a quiet signal that an oversight had been corrected or a possible stall tactic had been spotted.

🏁 Accepted and Moving Forward

The buyers accepted Counter-Offer No. 3, on the seller’s terms, with clarified responsibilities and required documentation in place. The listing remained active on the MLS. In broker-to-broker comments, Jon acknowledged the accepted offer with a bump, but strongly encouraged additional showings.

This allowed the deal to proceed without ambiguity or unnecessary exposure, while still welcoming competition until the bump period resolved. It wasn’t just a clean deal—it was a subtle, but immediate course correction that brought the transaction back to a place of accountability and trust. Both buyer and seller walked forward with confidence.

🧭 Lessons from the Field

• “Clean” offers deserve scrutiny, especially when price concessions are involved
• Bump clauses must be specific, documented, and time-bound
• Never leave deadlines or conditions vague
• A broker’s job is to respectfully represent their client's best interests while not provoking anger or hard feelings between the parties
• Strive to keep everyone calm and focused on the goal
• The objective isn’t to just clobber the other side—it’s to implement a favorable exchange for your client. You’re helping your seller convert the inherent value of their real property, an illiquid asset, into a liquid asset: cash. You’re a transaction expert, not a corner man in a cage fight. This isn’t about bruises or blind loyalty. It’s about clarity, composure, and a successful transaction.